Why No Tweet From IGP

Question well asked YB. (Why no tweet on threats against BFM journalist, DAP asks Khalid - See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/why-no-tweet-on-threats-against-bfm-journalist-dap-asks-khalid#sthash.pTsr7TUG.dpuf)

My take on the current situation.

Majority of Pakatan leaders are harping on the economy and is fighting impending arrest.
Majority of UMNO leaders are trying to fends of the attack by giving frivolous illogical reason
Majority of MCA leaders are trying to bite at the heels of any pakatan folks they can chase after esp DAP
Majority of MIC is leaders are still at each other throats
Majority of Gerakan leaders are.... are.. where are they again?
Majority of PAS leaders are happily getting girls all wrapped up to look like Arabs, talk like Arabs but is not arabs
Majority of the Police are deployed to surround houses of opposition leaders or arresting them
Mr IGP is busy tweeting

Facts - thugs on motorcycles armed with parang slashes victims and robbing. Crazies threatening to rape woman. Victim who fought off arm robbers faces possible death penalty while arm robbers who slash victims are still free to roam and slash more victims. Gangs are blowing each other heads off. (after most of their heads enemy heads are off - would it be ours soon?)

Question - since all so call law makers are busy with macro events and IGP is busy tweeting to arrest lawfully elected law makers - who is left to defend common folks like you and me from the current onslaught parang wielding motorcycle thugs?

Father and Son to face death penalty for killing robber at home

Father and Son to Face Death Penalty for Killing Robber
When I read the headline in our local paper and asiaone of Singapore i was like, Wow! What? and then with much emotion - Why are the victims being charged? Haven't they being through enough having been slashed at and now the Police want to charge them for killing an arm robber in the midst of defending themselves?

(Anyway, the latest news is that the father and son duo sentence will be reduced to death by negligence.)

to death by negligenc

There are still lingering questions unanswered.

From the picture of the newspaper report here, it shows that the father and son duo are handcuffed. And in Malaysia you will be handcuffed only if you are being arrested.

Question is -

1. Was there a forensic finding on the spot that confirmed that the assailant was beaten to death only after he was tied up? Can that be technically concluded on the spot?
2. If not - on what basis was the father and son being handcuffed and treated like a common criminal when all that they did was to defense themselves? 
3. Based on a report on malaymail online it quoted a lawyer who says that  in the Penal Code "anyone ......has the right to protect him or herself even if it results in the death of the assailant.  But then of course I believe there will be other contingencies that may negate the above.
4. Was due diligence done on the situation of the moment of the incident before the decision was make to charge the victims for murder?
5. Who decides to charge the victims for murder?

I have to ask the above because the report from the newspaper have left out pertinent information leading up to the victims being charged for murder.

Without those information the public would naturally felt outraged for the seemingly injustice done on the victims and the indifference attitude of the police who see it necessary to handcuffed the victims whose wife was slashed by the assailant!

The public tend to relates to the victim situation as most of us have read about individuals being slashed and robbed by armed men in the ATM vicinity, petrol stations, in our house, driving a motorcycle or even walking on the street - and most of the time we have never heard that these robbers are apprehended or brought to justice in a court of law while some of their victims remain in hospital or have died.

And just as we read about the table being turn on a robber the Police have to announce that the victims will be charged for murder!

Can you beat that?

Driving in Malaysia laid-back Town

5 signs that you are driving in a laidback town / city in Msia.
1 - most cars in a laidback town was sold without a horn. I found this out after observing long stretches of motorist waiting for a retard motorist with a phone who doesnt seem interested to move even though the light has turn green for the past 3 minutes.I got to give the rest of the drivers a medal for their patience.Really

2 - most driver drive at a speed slightly above a cyclist. They are not in any hurry to go any where even though it is in the middle of the day when normal people are supposed to be rushing back to office after lunch.My good friend who has a passion in cycle sport would've shamed most of the motorist here.

3 - motor cyclist has the right to drive in the middle of the road at 20-30mph irregardless of the time of the day and the rest of the world can wait or just park by the road side and have a ciggies for all they care.

4 - motorist and especially motorcyclist don't need to wait when they come out from a small lane into the main driving lane. Too bad for the motorist in the main lane for they would have to either brake or swerve to the right and hope they wont bang into any car

5 - motorist in laidback town love their cars so much that they will immediately brake at the slightest sign of a small hump or bump in front of them. To hell to those following at the back